DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Clio vs 2016 Skoda Octavia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

65.25–64.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeSkoda
ClioModelOctavia
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
199 km/hTop speed199 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
120 HPPower110 HP
205 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—TransmissionManual
185/65 R15; 195/55 R16; 205/45 R17Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4062 mmLength4659 mm
1731 mmWidth1814 mm
1448 mmHeight1461 mm
1090-1195 KgWeight1230 kg
—Luggage capacity568 lt
2589 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Skoda OctaviaDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Clio and 2016 Skoda Octavia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…