DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Skoda Octavia vs 2016 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.25–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeRenault
OctaviaModelClio
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
199 km/hTop speed199 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
110 HPPower120 HP
175 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size185/65 R15; 195/55 R16; 205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4659 mmLength4062 mm
1814 mmWidth1731 mm
1461 mmHeight1448 mm
1230 kgWeight1090-1195 Kg
568 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2589 mm

Additional Features

Skoda OctaviaDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Skoda Octavia and 2016 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…