2016 • Skoda
Rapid
Skoda Rapid 1.2 TSI (110 Hp) 2016Overall Score64.5/100
2016 Skoda Rapid vs 2016 Renault Clio Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.2 Energy TCe (120 Hp) 2016Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Renault Clio
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda RapidSpecificationRenault Clio
SkodaMakeRenault
RapidModelClio
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Skoda RapidSpecificationRenault Clio
9,8 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
200 km/hTop speed199 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
110 HPPower120 HP
175 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda RapidSpecificationRenault Clio
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda RapidSpecificationRenault Clio
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size185/65 R15; 195/55 R16; 205/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda RapidSpecificationRenault Clio
4483 mmLength4062 mm
1706 mmWidth1731 mm
1461 mmHeight1448 mm
1110 KgWeight1090-1195 Kg
2602 mmWheelbase2589 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Skoda Rapid and 2016 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…