DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Renault Clio vs 2000 ZAZ 1102 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

ZAZ 1102

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeZAZ
ClioModel1102
1995Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3

Performance

145 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1108 ccEngine displacement1091 cc
49 HPPower53 HP
79 NmTorque80 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank39 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,1 ltAverage consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
145/70 R13Tyre size155/70 R13S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3709 mmLength3708 mm
1616 mmWidth1554 mm
1395 mmHeight1410 mm
810 KgWeight727 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2320 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Renault Clio and 2000 ZAZ 1102 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, ZAZ 1102 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…