DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 ZAZ 1102 vs 1995 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

ZAZ 1102

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ZAZMakeRenault
1102ModelClio
2000Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

148 km/hTop speed145 km/h
1091 ccEngine displacement1108 cc
53 HPPower49 HP
80 NmTorque79 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
39 ltFuel tank43 lt
—Urban consumption6,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,5 lt
6 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13STyre size145/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3708 mmLength3709 mm
1554 mmWidth1616 mm
1410 mmHeight1395 mm
727 KgWeight810 Kg
2320 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 ZAZ 1102 and 1995 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, ZAZ 1102 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…