2000 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.2 (45 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
2000 Opel Combo vs 1995 Renault Clio Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.1 (49 Hp) 1995Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Opel Combo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel ComboSpecificationRenault Clio
OpelMakeRenault
ComboModelClio
2000Model year1995
Pick-upBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
3Doors3/5
Performance
Opel ComboSpecificationRenault Clio
0 km/hTop speed145 km/h
1195 ccEngine displacement1108 cc
45 HPPower49 HP
88 NmTorque79 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel ComboSpecificationRenault Clio
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank43 lt
—Urban consumption6,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,5 lt
—Average consumption6,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel ComboSpecificationRenault Clio
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size145/70 R13
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Opel ComboSpecificationRenault Clio
4230 mmLength3709 mm
1686 mmWidth1616 mm
1805 mmHeight1395 mm
1065 KgWeight810 Kg
2480 mmWheelbase2472 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Opel Combo and 1995 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…