1995 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.1 (49 Hp) 1995Overall Score51.5/100
1995 Renault Clio vs 2000 Opel Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.2 (45 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Opel Combo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault ClioSpecificationOpel Combo
RenaultMakeOpel
ClioModelCombo
1995Model year2000
HatchbackBody typePick-up
5Seats2
3/5Doors3
Performance
Renault ClioSpecificationOpel Combo
145 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1108 ccEngine displacement1195 cc
49 HPPower45 HP
79 NmTorque88 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault ClioSpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Renault ClioSpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
145/70 R13Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Renault ClioSpecificationOpel Combo
3709 mmLength4230 mm
1616 mmWidth1686 mm
1395 mmHeight1805 mm
810 KgWeight1065 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2480 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Renault Clio and 2000 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…