DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 RAM 1500 vs 2009 Jeep Wrangler Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Wrangler

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RAMMakeJeep
1500ModelWrangler
2012Model year2009
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5-6Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3701 ccEngine displacement3778 cc
215 HPPower196 HP
319 NmTorque315 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,8 ltUrban consumption16,7 lt
10,0 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
—Average consumption11,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
265/70 R17Tyre size255/75 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5816 mmLength4751 mm
—Width1877 mm
1906 mmHeight1834 mm
2232 KgWeight1895 Kg
3569 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 RAM 1500 and 2009 Jeep Wrangler approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…