2009 • Jeep
Wrangler
Jeep Wrangler 3.8i V6 12V (196 Hp) 2009Overall Score74.5/100
2009 Jeep Wrangler vs 2012 RAM 1500 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • RAM
1500
RAM 1500 3.7 V6 (215 Hp) 2012Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Jeep Wrangler
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jeep WranglerSpecificationRAM 1500
JeepMakeRAM
WranglerModel1500
2009Model year2012
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5-6
5Doors4
Performance
Jeep WranglerSpecificationRAM 1500
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3778 ccEngine displacement3701 cc
196 HPPower215 HP
315 NmTorque319 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Jeep WranglerSpecificationRAM 1500
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank98 lt
16,7 ltUrban consumption14,8 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption10,0 lt
11,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Jeep WranglerSpecificationRAM 1500
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
255/75 R17Tyre size265/70 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Jeep WranglerSpecificationRAM 1500
4751 mmLength5816 mm
1877 mmWidth—
1834 mmHeight1906 mm
1895 KgWeight2232 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase3569 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Jeep Wrangler and 2012 RAM 1500 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…