DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Toyota Land Cruiser vs 2012 RAM 1500 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

RAM 1500

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeRAM
Land CruiserModel1500
2013Model year2012
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats5-6
5Doors4

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3956 ccEngine displacement3701 cc
281 HPPower215 HP
385 NmTorque319 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
87 ltFuel tank98 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption14,8 lt
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption10,0 lt
10,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
—Tyre size265/70 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4780 mmLength5816 mm
1885 mmWidth—
1845 mmHeight1906 mm
2900 KgWeight2232 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase3569 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Toyota Land Cruiser and 2012 RAM 1500 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, RAM 1500 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…