DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Perodua Nippa vs 2000 Daewoo Tico Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Tico

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

38.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakeDaewoo
NippaModelTico
1996Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

16,0 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
135 km/hTop speed143 km/h
847 ccEngine displacement796 cc
58 HPPower48 HP
63 NmTorque64 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
32 ltFuel tank30 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
145/70 R12Tyre size135 R12
YesABS—

Dimensions

3395 mmLength3340 mm
1395 mmWidth1400 mm
1410 mmHeight1395 mm
650 KgWeight640 Kg
2280 mmWheelbase2335 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Perodua Nippa and 2000 Daewoo Tico approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Tico leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…