2000 • Daewoo
Matiz
Daewoo Matiz 0.8 i (52 Hp) 2000Overall Score39.5/100
2000 Daewoo Matiz vs 1996 Perodua Nippa Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Perodua
Nippa
Perodua Nippa 0.9 (58 Hp) 1996Overall Score38.5/100
WINNER
Daewoo Matiz
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
39.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Daewoo MatizSpecificationPerodua Nippa
DaewooMakePerodua
MatizModelNippa
2000Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Daewoo MatizSpecificationPerodua Nippa
17,0 s0–100 km/h16,0 s
144 km/hTop speed135 km/h
796 ccEngine displacement847 cc
52 HPPower58 HP
69 NmTorque63 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Daewoo MatizSpecificationPerodua Nippa
PetrolFuel typePetrol
38 ltFuel tank32 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Daewoo MatizSpecificationPerodua Nippa
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
145/70 R13Tyre size145/70 R12
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Daewoo MatizSpecificationPerodua Nippa
3495 mmLength3395 mm
1495 mmWidth1395 mm
1480 mmHeight1410 mm
725 KgWeight650 Kg
2340 mmWheelbase2280 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Daewoo Matiz and 1996 Perodua Nippa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Matiz leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…