DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Agila vs 1996 Perodua Nippa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Agila

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakePerodua
AgilaModelNippa
2000Model year1996
MinivanBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

18,0 s0–100 km/h16,0 s
142 km/hTop speed135 km/h
973 ccEngine displacement847 cc
58 HPPower58 HP
85 NmTorque63 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank32 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
6 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/55 R14Tyre size145/70 R12
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3500 mmLength3395 mm
1620 mmWidth1395 mm
1700 mmHeight1410 mm
940 KgWeight650 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2280 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Agila and 1996 Perodua Nippa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Agila leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…