DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Perodua Nippa vs 2004 Volkswagen Lupo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Lupo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

42.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakeVolkswagen
NippaModelLupo
2006Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

16,0 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
132 km/hTop speed152 km/h
659 ccEngine displacement999 cc
31 HPPower50 HP
49 NmTorque86 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
32 ltFuel tank34 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
145/70 R12Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3395 mmLength3527 mm
1395 mmWidth1640 mm
1410 mmHeight1460 mm
650 KgWeight884 Kg
2280 mmWheelbase2323 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Perodua Nippa and 2004 Volkswagen Lupo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Lupo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…