DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Perodua Kelisa vs 2006 Perodua Nippa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kelisa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

43.5–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakePerodua
KelisaModelNippa
2004Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,8 s0–100 km/h16,0 s
140 km/hTop speed132 km/h
989 ccEngine displacement659 cc
56 HPPower31 HP
88 NmTorque49 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank32 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R12Tyre size145/70 R12
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3480 mmLength3395 mm
1490 mmWidth1395 mm
1425 mmHeight1410 mm
775 KgWeight650 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2280 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Perodua Kelisa and 2006 Perodua Nippa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kelisa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…