DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Smart Roadster vs 2006 Perodua Nippa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Roadster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

43.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SmartMakePerodua
RoadsterModelNippa
2004Model year2006
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h16,0 s
160 km/hTop speed132 km/h
698 ccEngine displacement659 cc
61 HPPower31 HP
95 NmTorque49 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank32 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size145/70 R12
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3427 mmLength3395 mm
1615 mmWidth1395 mm
1207 mmHeight1410 mm
790 KgWeight650 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2280 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Smart Roadster and 2006 Perodua Nippa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…