DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Perodua Nippa vs 2004 Perodua Kelisa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kelisa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

42.5–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeroduaMakePerodua
NippaModelKelisa
2006Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

16,0 s0–100 km/h14,8 s
132 km/hTop speed140 km/h
659 ccEngine displacement989 cc
31 HPPower56 HP
49 NmTorque88 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
32 ltFuel tank40 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption5,3 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
145/70 R12Tyre size155/70 R12
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3395 mmLength3480 mm
1395 mmWidth1490 mm
1410 mmHeight1425 mm
650 KgWeight775 Kg
2280 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Perodua Nippa and 2004 Perodua Kelisa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kelisa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…