DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Opel Omega vs 1995 Toyota 4runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeToyota
OmegaModel4runner
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
200 km/hTop speed165 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2694 cc
131 HPPower150 HP
250 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size225/75 R15; 265/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4785 mmLength4539 mm
1785 mmWidth1689 mm
1450 mmHeight1689-1745 mm
1605 KgWeight1515 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Opel Omega and 1995 Toyota 4runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…