DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Audi 80 vs 1995 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationOpel Omega
AudiMakeOpel
80ModelOmega
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationOpel Omega
10,1 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
195 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2309 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
133 HPPower131 HP
186 NmTorque250 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank75 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationOpel Omega
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationOpel Omega
4482 mmLength4785 mm
1695 mmWidth1785 mm
1408 mmHeight1450 mm
1310 KgWeight1605 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Audi 80 and 1995 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…