DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Toyota 4runner vs 1995 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota 4runner

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeOpel
4runnerModelOmega
1995Model year1995
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
165 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2694 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
150 HPPower131 HP
240 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption10,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/75 R15; 265/70 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4539 mmLength4785 mm
1689 mmWidth1785 mm
1689-1745 mmHeight1450 mm
1515 KgWeight1605 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Toyota 4runner and 1995 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota 4runner leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…