1990 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.3 TD Interc. (100 Hp) 1990Overall Score56.25/100
1990 Opel Omega vs 1990 Citroen XM Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Citroen
XM
Citroen XM 2.0 i (121 Hp) 1990Overall Score55.5/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationCitroen XM
OpelMakeCitroen
OmegaModelXM
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationCitroen XM
14,0 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
184 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2260 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
100 HPPower121 HP
215 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationCitroen XM
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption12,8 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationCitroen XM
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationCitroen XM
4740 mmLength4710 mm
1760 mmWidth1795 mm
1445 mmHeight1385 mm
1375 KgWeight1310 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Opel Omega and 1990 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…