1990 • Toyota
Chaser
Toyota Chaser 1.8i (105 Hp) 1990Overall Score55.5/100
1990 Toyota Chaser vs 1990 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.3 TD Interc. (100 Hp) 1990Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota ChaserSpecificationOpel Omega
ToyotaMakeOpel
ChaserModelOmega
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Toyota ChaserSpecificationOpel Omega
—0–100 km/h14,0 s
0 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1838 ccEngine displacement2260 cc
105 HPPower100 HP
149 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota ChaserSpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank75 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
—Average consumption7,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota ChaserSpecificationOpel Omega
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size185/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota ChaserSpecificationOpel Omega
4690 mmLength4740 mm
1695 mmWidth1760 mm
1375 mmHeight1445 mm
—Weight1375 Kg
2680 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Toyota Chaser and 1990 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…