DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Citroen XM vs 1990 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeOpel
XMModelOmega
1990Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
201 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2260 cc
121 HPPower100 HP
172 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4710 mmLength4740 mm
1795 mmWidth1760 mm
1385 mmHeight1445 mm
1310 KgWeight1375 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Citroen XM and 1990 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…