DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Opel Omega vs 1995 Opel Campo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

40.25–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeOpel
OmegaModelCampo
1994Model year1995
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

20,5 s0–100 km/h23,1 s
163 km/hTop speed135 km/h
2260 ccEngine displacement2255 cc
73 HPPower94 HP
138 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4980 mm
1760 mmWidth1690 mm
1445 mmHeight1710 mm
1355 KgWeight—
2730 mmWheelbase3025 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Opel Omega and 1995 Opel Campo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…