DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 GAZ 31 vs 1994 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

39.5–40.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Omega
GAZMakeOpel
31ModelOmega
1996Model year1994
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Omega
24,0 s0–100 km/h20,5 s
135 km/hTop speed163 km/h
2445 ccEngine displacement2260 cc
81 HPPower73 HP
167 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption7,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,4 lt
10,8 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Omega
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Omega
4885 mmLength4740 mm
1800 mmWidth1760 mm
1576 mmHeight1445 mm
1540 KgWeight1355 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 GAZ 31 and 1994 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…