1994 • Opel
Campo
Opel Campo 2.3 (94 Hp) 1994Overall Score39.5/100
1994 Opel Campo vs 1994 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1994 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.3 D (73 Hp) 1994Overall Score40.25/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
39.5–40.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel CampoSpecificationOpel Omega
OpelMakeOpel
CampoModelOmega
1994Model year1994
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Opel CampoSpecificationOpel Omega
23,1 s0–100 km/h20,5 s
135 km/hTop speed163 km/h
2255 ccEngine displacement2260 cc
94 HPPower73 HP
170 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel CampoSpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption7,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,4 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel CampoSpecificationOpel Omega
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/70 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Opel CampoSpecificationOpel Omega
4980 mmLength4740 mm
1690 mmWidth1760 mm
1710 mmHeight1445 mm
—Weight1355 Kg
3025 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1994 Opel Campo and 1994 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…