2000 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.2 DTI (120 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.5/100
2000 Opel Omega vs 2000 BMW Z3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • BMW
Z3
BMW Z3 1.9 (118 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationBMW Z3
OpelMakeBMW
OmegaModelZ3
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationBMW Z3
12,5 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
240 km/hTop speed196 km/h
2171 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
120 HPPower118 HP
280 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationBMW Z3
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank51 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption11 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationBMW Z3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationBMW Z3
4898 mmLength4050 mm
1776 mmWidth1740 mm
1455 mmHeight1288 mm
1670 KgWeight1220 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2446 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Opel Omega and 2000 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…