DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeOpel
FreelanderModelOmega
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
165 km/hTop speed240 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement2171 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
165 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
59 ltFuel tank75 lt
13 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4382 mmLength4898 mm
1805 mmWidth1776 mm
1760 mmHeight1455 mm
1380 KgWeight1670 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…