2000 • BMW
Z3
BMW Z3 1.9 (118 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.25/100
2000 BMW Z3 vs 2000 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.2 DTI (120 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
BMW Z3SpecificationOpel Omega
BMWMakeOpel
Z3ModelOmega
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
BMW Z3SpecificationOpel Omega
10,4 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
196 km/hTop speed240 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement2171 cc
118 HPPower120 HP
190 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
BMW Z3SpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank75 lt
11 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
—Average consumption7,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
BMW Z3SpecificationOpel Omega
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
BMW Z3SpecificationOpel Omega
4050 mmLength4898 mm
1740 mmWidth1776 mm
1288 mmHeight1455 mm
1220 KgWeight1670 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 BMW Z3 and 2000 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…