DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Omega vs 2000 Mercedes-Benz E Serisi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeMercedes-Benz
OmegaModelE Serisi
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
240 km/hTop speed198 km/h
2171 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
120 HPPower136 HP
280 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption13,3 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4898 mmLength4816 mm
1776 mmWidth1799 mm
1455 mmHeight1438 mm
1670 KgWeight1540 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2833 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Omega and 2000 Mercedes-Benz E Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…