2016 • Audi
Q3
Audi Q3 2.0 TDI (184 Hp) 2016Overall Score77.75/100
2016 Audi Q3 vs 2016 Ford Mondeo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi (210 Hp) 2016Overall Score78.75/100
WINNER
Ford Mondeo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
77.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi Q3SpecificationFord Mondeo
AudiMakeFord
Q3ModelMondeo
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Audi Q3SpecificationFord Mondeo
7,9 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
219 km/hTop speed233 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
184 HPPower210 HP
380 NmTorque450 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi Q3SpecificationFord Mondeo
DieselFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank62 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi Q3SpecificationFord Mondeo
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 PowerShift
235/55 R17Tyre size215/60 R16; 235/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 R19
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi Q3SpecificationFord Mondeo
4388 mmLength4871 mm
1831 mmWidth1852 mm
1608 mmHeight1482 mm
1605 KgWeight1525 Kg
2603 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Audi Q3 and 2016 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…