2016 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi (210 Hp) 2016Overall Score78.75/100
2016 Ford Mondeo vs 2016 Audi Q3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Audi
Q3
Audi Q3 2.0 TDI (184 Hp) 2016Overall Score77.75/100
WINNER
Ford Mondeo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi Q3
FordMakeAudi
MondeoModelQ3
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi Q3
7,9 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
233 km/hTop speed219 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
210 HPPower184 HP
450 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi Q3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank64 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi Q3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 PowerShiftGears6
215/60 R16; 235/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 R19Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi Q3
4871 mmLength4388 mm
1852 mmWidth1831 mm
1482 mmHeight1608 mm
1525 KgWeight1605 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2603 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Mondeo and 2016 Audi Q3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…