DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Galaxy vs 2016 Audi Q3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Galaxy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford GalaxySpecificationAudi Q3
FordMakeAudi
GalaxyModelQ3
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Ford GalaxySpecificationAudi Q3
8,9 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
214 km/hTop speed219 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
210 HPPower184 HP
450 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford GalaxySpecificationAudi Q3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank64 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford GalaxySpecificationAudi Q3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 PowershiftGears6
235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 245/45 R19Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford GalaxySpecificationAudi Q3
4848 mmLength4388 mm
1916 mmWidth1831 mm
1747 mmHeight1608 mm
1704 KgWeight1605 Kg
2849 mmWheelbase2603 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Galaxy and 2016 Audi Q3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…