2016 • Audi
Q2
Audi Q2 2.0 TFSI (190 Hp) 2016Overall Score77.75/100
2016 Audi Q2 vs 2016 Ford S-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Ford
S-Max
Ford S-Max 2.0 TDCi (210 Hp) 2016Overall Score78.75/100
WINNER
Ford S-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
77.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi Q2SpecificationFord S-Max
AudiMakeFord
Q2ModelS-Max
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeMPV
5Seats5/7
5Doors5
Performance
Audi Q2SpecificationFord S-Max
6,5 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
228 km/hTop speed218 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
190 HPPower210 HP
320 NmTorque450 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi Q2SpecificationFord S-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi Q2SpecificationFord S-Max
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
7 S-tronicGears6 PowerShift
—Tyre size235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 245/45 R19
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi Q2SpecificationFord S-Max
4191 mmLength4796 mm
1794 mmWidth1916 mm
1508 mmHeight1953 mm
1430 KgWeight1766 Kg
2601 mmWheelbase2849 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Audi Q2 and 2016 Ford S-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford S-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…