2016 • Ford
S-Max
Ford S-Max 2.0 TDCi (210 Hp) 2016Overall Score78.75/100
2016 Ford S-Max vs 2016 Audi Q2 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Audi
Q2
Audi Q2 2.0 TFSI (190 Hp) 2016Overall Score77.75/100
WINNER
Ford S-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford S-MaxSpecificationAudi Q2
FordMakeAudi
S-MaxModelQ2
2016Model year2016
MPVBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford S-MaxSpecificationAudi Q2
8,8 s0–100 km/h6,5 s
218 km/hTop speed228 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
210 HPPower190 HP
450 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford S-MaxSpecificationAudi Q2
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford S-MaxSpecificationAudi Q2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 PowerShiftGears7 S-tronic
235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 245/45 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford S-MaxSpecificationAudi Q2
4796 mmLength4191 mm
1916 mmWidth1794 mm
1953 mmHeight1508 mm
1766 KgWeight1430 Kg
2849 mmWheelbase2601 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford S-Max and 2016 Audi Q2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford S-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…