2016 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi (210 Hp) 2016Overall Score78.75/100
2016 Ford Mondeo vs 2016 Audi Q2 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Audi
Q2
Audi Q2 2.0 TFSI (190 Hp) 2016Overall Score77.75/100
WINNER
Ford Mondeo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi Q2
FordMakeAudi
MondeoModelQ2
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi Q2
7,9 s0–100 km/h6,5 s
233 km/hTop speed228 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
210 HPPower190 HP
450 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi Q2
DieselFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi Q2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 PowerShiftGears7 S-tronic
215/60 R16; 235/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi Q2
4871 mmLength4191 mm
1852 mmWidth1794 mm
1482 mmHeight1508 mm
1525 KgWeight1430 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2601 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Mondeo and 2016 Audi Q2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…