2014 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.4 CNG (120 Hp) 2014Overall Score60.25/100
2014 Opel Combo vs 2014 Mazda 2 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2014 • Mazda
2
Mazda 2 1.5 SkyActiv-G (115 Hp) 2014Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Opel Combo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 2
OpelMakeMazda
ComboModel2
2014Model year2014
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 2
12,3 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
172 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1496 cc
120 HPPower115 HP
206 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 2
Petrol / CNGFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank44 lt
—Urban consumption6,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size185/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 2
4390 mmLength4060 mm
1831 mmWidth1695 mm
1845-2100 mmHeight1495 mm
—Weight975 Kg
2755 mmWheelbase2570 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Opel Combo and 2014 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…