DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Mazda 2 vs 2014 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Combo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationOpel Combo
MazdaMakeOpel
2ModelCombo
2014Model year2014
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationOpel Combo
8,7 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
200 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
115 HPPower120 HP
148 NmTorque206 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typePetrol / CNG
44 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
185/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationOpel Combo
4060 mmLength4390 mm
1695 mmWidth1831 mm
1495 mmHeight1845-2100 mm
975 KgWeight—
2570 mmWheelbase2755 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Mazda 2 and 2014 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…