DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Honda FIT vs 2014 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Combo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda FITSpecificationOpel Combo
HondaMakeOpel
FITModelCombo
2014Model year2014
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Honda FITSpecificationOpel Combo
—0–100 km/h12,3 s
0 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
110 HPPower120 HP
134 NmTorque206 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda FITSpecificationOpel Combo
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typePetrol / CNG
32 ltFuel tank60 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda FITSpecificationOpel Combo
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Honda FITSpecificationOpel Combo
3955 mmLength4390 mm
1695 mmWidth1831 mm
1525 mmHeight1845-2100 mm
1080 KgWeight—
2530 mmWheelbase2755 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Honda FIT and 2014 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…