2013 • Opel
Cascada
Opel Cascada 2.0 CDTI (165 Hp) 2013Overall Score67.75/100
2013 Opel Cascada vs 2013 Volvo XC60 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Volvo
XC60
Volvo XC60 2.0 D3 (163 Hp) 2013Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Volvo XC60
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel CascadaSpecificationVolvo XC60
OpelMakeVolvo
CascadaModelXC60
2013Model year2013
CabrioletBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Opel CascadaSpecificationVolvo XC60
10,4 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
212 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
165 HPPower163 HP
350 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Opel CascadaSpecificationVolvo XC60
DieselFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Opel CascadaSpecificationVolvo XC60
4696 mmLength4627 mm
1839 mmWidth1891 mm
1443 mmHeight1713 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight1728 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2774 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Opel Cascada and 2013 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…