2013 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 2.0 SkyActiv-G (165 Hp) 2013Overall Score68.5/100
2013 Mazda 3 vs 2013 Opel Cascada Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Opel
Cascada
Opel Cascada 2.0 CDTI (165 Hp) 2013Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationOpel Cascada
MazdaMakeOpel
3ModelCascada
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationOpel Cascada
8,2 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
210 km/hTop speed212 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
165 HPPower165 HP
210 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationOpel Cascada
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank56 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationOpel Cascada
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/45 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationOpel Cascada
4460 mmLength4696 mm
1795 mmWidth1839 mm
1450 mmHeight1443 mm
1220 KgWeight1701-1816 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2695 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Mazda 3 and 2013 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…