DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo XC60 vs 2013 Opel Cascada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC60

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeOpel
XC60ModelCascada
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
195 km/hTop speed212 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
163 HPPower165 HP
400 NmTorque350 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank56 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4627 mmLength4696 mm
1891 mmWidth1839 mm
1713 mmHeight1443 mm
1728 KgWeight1701-1816 Kg
2774 mmWheelbase2695 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo XC60 and 2013 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…