DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Opel Cascada vs 2013 Seat Exeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Exeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeSeat
CascadaModelExeo
2013Model year2013
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
212 km/hTop speed225 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
165 HPPower160 HP
350 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4696 mmLength4661 mm
1839 mmWidth1772 mm
1443 mmHeight1430 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight1495 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2642 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Opel Cascada and 2013 Seat Exeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Exeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…