DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Opel Cascada vs 2013 Mini Convertible Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Convertible

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeMini
CascadaModelConvertible
2013Model year2013
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
4Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
212 km/hTop speed225 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
165 HPPower184 HP
350 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size195/55 R16 87V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4696 mmLength3729 mm
1839 mmWidth1683 mm
1443 mmHeight1414 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight1230 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2467 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Opel Cascada and 2013 Mini Convertible approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Convertible leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…