DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Opel Cascada vs 2014 Mazda 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel CascadaSpecificationMazda 2
OpelMakeMazda
CascadaModel2
2014Model year2014
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Opel CascadaSpecificationMazda 2
11,9 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
195 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1362 ccEngine displacement1496 cc
120 HPPower115 HP
200 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel CascadaSpecificationMazda 2
PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank44 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel CascadaSpecificationMazda 2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size185/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel CascadaSpecificationMazda 2
4696 mmLength4060 mm
1839 mmWidth1695 mm
1443 mmHeight1495 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight975 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Opel Cascada and 2014 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…