DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Ford KA vs 2014 Opel Cascada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KASpecificationOpel Cascada
FordMakeOpel
KAModelCascada
2014Model year2014
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

Ford KASpecificationOpel Cascada
—0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1362 cc
110 HPPower120 HP
146 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KASpecificationOpel Cascada
Petrol / Ethanol – E85Fuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption8,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KASpecificationOpel Cascada
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
175/65 R14; 195/55 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KASpecificationOpel Cascada
4254 mmLength4696 mm
1695 mmWidth1839 mm
1460 mmHeight1443 mm
1032 KgWeight1701-1816 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2695 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Ford KA and 2014 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…