DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Mazda 2 vs 2014 Opel Cascada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationOpel Cascada
MazdaMakeOpel
2ModelCascada
2014Model year2014
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationOpel Cascada
8,7 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
200 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1362 cc
115 HPPower120 HP
148 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationOpel Cascada
PetrolFuel typePetrol
44 ltFuel tank56 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationOpel Cascada
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
185/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationOpel Cascada
4060 mmLength4696 mm
1695 mmWidth1839 mm
1495 mmHeight1443 mm
975 KgWeight1701-1816 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2695 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Mazda 2 and 2014 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…