DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Opel Cascada vs 2014 Ford KA Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel CascadaSpecificationFord KA
OpelMakeFord
CascadaModelKA
2014Model year2014
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Opel CascadaSpecificationFord KA
11,9 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1362 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
120 HPPower110 HP
200 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel CascadaSpecificationFord KA
PetrolFuel typePetrol / Ethanol – E85
56 ltFuel tank51 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Opel CascadaSpecificationFord KA
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size175/65 R14; 195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Opel CascadaSpecificationFord KA
4696 mmLength4254 mm
1839 mmWidth1695 mm
1443 mmHeight1460 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight1032 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2491 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Opel Cascada and 2014 Ford KA approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…