2000 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 2.0 DiTD (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score53.25/100
2000 Mazda 323 vs 2000 Opel Campo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Opel
Campo
Opel Campo 2.3 (98 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 323
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Campo
MazdaMakeOpel
323ModelCampo
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Campo
12,2 s0–100 km/h—
178 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2255 cc
90 HPPower98 HP
220 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Campo
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Campo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Campo
4200 mmLength4980 mm
1705 mmWidth1690 mm
1410 mmHeight1710 mm
1175 KgWeight—
2610 mmWheelbase3025 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda 323 and 2000 Opel Campo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…