2000 • Opel
Campo
Opel Campo 2.3 (98 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
2000 Opel Campo vs 2000 Mazda 323 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 2.0 DiTD (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 323
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel CampoSpecificationMazda 323
OpelMakeMazda
CampoModel323
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Opel CampoSpecificationMazda 323
—0–100 km/h12,2 s
0 km/hTop speed178 km/h
2255 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
98 HPPower90 HP
0 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel CampoSpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel CampoSpecificationMazda 323
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Opel CampoSpecificationMazda 323
4980 mmLength4200 mm
1690 mmWidth1705 mm
1710 mmHeight1410 mm
—Weight1175 Kg
3025 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Opel Campo and 2000 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…